|
Dolan Case - OIA-LC's landmark victory at US Supreme Court |
|
|
|
|
Saturday, 10 January 2009 12:45 |
A HUGE VICTORY FOR PROPERTY RIGHTS
WON BY THE OIA LEGAL CENTER IN THE
U.S. SUPREME COURT
The United States
Supreme Court sent shock waves all across the country when it struck down the
City of Tigard’s attempt to "take" a portion of the Dolan family’s property for
a public bikepath as a condition to granting a permit to expanding their
plumbing store. The Washington Times, commenting on the Dolan
decision, said "The Dolan ruling represents the Supreme Court’s stoutest defense
of private property witnessed in 50 years."
Convinced that the City
violated the Dolans’ property rights under the 5th and 14th Amendments to the
U.S. Constitution, the OIA Legal Center stepped in to represent the Dolans in
appeals that took the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Fortunately, the high court (which takes less than 2% of the cases
appealed to it), recognized the need to address the widespread use of the
permitting process by government to "extort" property or money (by imposing
conditions on permits that are not justified by the development).
In its
decision upholding the Dolans’ rights, the Supreme Court established a new
"property rights" protection standard every level of government in the nation
must comply with. It requires that governments must demonstrate that conditions
they impose on permits must be "roughly proportional" to the adverse impacts of
the development, based upon an "individualized determination" that the condition
is related both in nature and extent to such impacts.
The court found
that the bikepath condition imposed by the City of Tigard violated this
requirement, and remanded the case back to the City, which then tried to impose
a slightly modified bikepath condition which also violated the
Dolan decision..
Based on the high court decision, the
Dolans sought compensation in Circuit Court for the unconstitutional takings. In
the middle of a trial before a jury, the City agreed to pay $1,500,000 in
settlement of the Dolan family’s claim (which included compensation as well as
attorney fees). To put the case in perspective, the City could have purchased
the land (it wanted for a bikepath) for $14,000.
* * * * * * * *
While the decision has
curbed, to some extent, the use of "conditions" on building permits to "extort"
property or money, there is still considerable abuse by some local governments.
A high priority for Oregonians In Action Legal Center is helping property owners
challenge conditions that violate the Dolan decision. For
example, Dave Hunnicutt, Director of Legal Affairs, is handling an appeal to the
Oregon Court of Appeals in Rogers Machinery Co. v.
City of Tigard, a case involving imposition of a fee the Legal Center
believes violates Dolan.
|
|
Last Updated on Saturday, 17 January 2009 11:41 |
Site design and hosting by WebNation and Direct Northwest